Hopkins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
This petition for review of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals presents much the same issue as that involved in the case of Molter v. Commissioner, 69 F.(2d) 7, decided by this court, January 22; 1934. In that case the question was whether the petitioner took a vested or a contingent remainder in the residue of her father’s estate under the provisions of his will, and argument was -eon-fined to that point as determining the date of acquisition of the estate. Petitioner, however, insists that that cáse and a number of similar cases have emphasized the wrong point. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- O'Hare v. JohnstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- Lane v. CorwinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Hoblit v. HowserIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Huggett v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Helvering v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Van Vranken v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Warner v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Reynolds v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.