Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The complaint in this case stated two causes of action. The first was a law action for fraud and deceit, the claim being that appellant Louis Frank had knowingly submitted a false statement of his individual assets, in reliance upon which the plaintiff bank was induced to extend credit to his firm, Genesee Motors. The record discloses questions of fact as to whether appellant signed the financial statement and knew it to be false, and the jury’s verdict on the first cause of action may not be disturbed. Appellant’s motion for a new trial of that cause of action on the ground of newly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shultz v. . HoaglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Feist v. DruckermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Kain v. . LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Collins v. Central Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  5. Young v. . HeermansNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gentry v. Kovler (In Re Kovler)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Glenmore Distilleries Company v. SeidemanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
  3. United States v. CohnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API