Legal Opinion · Dissent

Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1972No. Appeal, No. 88Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pomeroy:

On numerous occasions in the past, this court has recognized that in enacting the Public Utility Code and creating the Public Utility Commission, the legislature sought to eliminate the vagaries and inequities of local utility regulation and to substitute a statewide standardization of all facets of the operation of public utilities, including but not limited to rates, service, installation and safety. Chester County v. Philadelphia Electric, 420 Pa. 422, 218 A. 2d 331 (1966) ; Einhorn v. Philadelphia Electric, 410 Pa. 630, 190 A. 2d 569 (1963);…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. City of Worcester v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Duquesne Light Co. v. Upper St. Clair TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Chester County v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API