Legal Opinion

In Re Saunders

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

Who were the distributees of the personal estate of Rowan D. Saunders at the time of his death in October, 1918?

This Court has consistently held that the distributees of a deceased soldier, holding war risk insurance, are to be ascertained at the date of the death of the soldier, in accordance with the intestate laws of the state in which the soldier lived.

It appears from the record that the mother of the deceased soldier was dead prior to 1918, but that his father was living, and that the soldier had no wife or child or issue of a child at the time of his death. Consequently, our statute of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PrudenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Grady v. . HollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Grady v. HollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Verchot's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hansbarger v. SpanglerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. In Re Estate of ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Healy v. Bellingham Branch Seattle-First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In re the Estate of ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API