State v. Wraggs
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WEIER, Judge.
Defendant was charged by information with burglary in the second degree. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and defendant was sentenced to four years imprisonment. On appeal, defendant asserts that during voir dire examination he was wrongfully required to use a peremptory challenge in lieu of a challenge for cause.
It is a well established rule in Missouri that a defendant in a criminal case has the right to a full panel of qualified jurors before he is required to make his peremptory challenges, State v. Hirsack, 465 S.W.2d 543, 545 [1] (Mo.1971); State v. Kirkpatrick, 428…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. CuckovichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. LandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Donald v. Sellers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- State v. DeClueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. HollimanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. EalyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. BrewsterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. StewartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.