Legal Opinion

State v. Wraggs

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1974No. 35178PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEIER, Judge.

Defendant was charged by information with burglary in the second degree. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and defendant was sentenced to four years imprisonment. On appeal, defendant asserts that during voir dire examination he was wrongfully required to use a peremptory challenge in lieu of a challenge for cause.

It is a well established rule in Missouri that a defendant in a criminal case has the right to a full panel of qualified jurors before he is required to make his peremptory challenges, State v. Hirsack, 465 S.W.2d 543, 545 [1] (Mo.1971); State v. Kirkpatrick, 428…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. CuckovichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. State v. LandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Donald v. Sellers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. State v. DeClueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. HollimanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State v. EalyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. BrewsterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. StewartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API