Smith v. Padgett
Ohio Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHolmes, J.
I am in full agreement with the majority’s decision that a tenant is competent to testify as to the rental value of leased premises in their unrepaired condition. However, I respectfully dissent from Part II of the opinion, as it inequitably *351penalizes landlords who, in good faith, miscalculate the amount they may lawfully withhold from a lessee’s security deposit.
This court set forth the proper parameters for construing the Landlord-Tenant Act in Vardeman v. Llewellyn (1985), 17 Ohio St. 3d 24, 28, 17 OBR 20, 23-24, 476 N.E. 2d 1038, 1041, wherein we stated:
“The Landlord-Tenant Act must be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vardeman v. LlewellynOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Albreqt v. ChenOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Berlinger v. Suburban Apartment Management Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Konig v. Bella Dora Management, Inc.Akron Municipal Court · 1983