Legal Opinion

Lescinsky v. Clark County School District

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided February 4, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00290Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 JAMES LESCINSKY, Case No.: 2:20-cv-00290-RFB-NJK 9 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 10 v. [Docket Nos. 24-26] 11 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s renewed motion for conditional certification. 14 Docket No. 24. Defendant filed a response in opposition and Plaintiff filed a reply. Docket Nos. 15 29, 32. The motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons 16 discussed below, the motion is DENIED without prejudice. 17 Defendant argues that conditional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John H. Harkins v. Riverboat Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Alcoa S. S. Co. v. Elmhurst Contracting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API