Legal Opinion

Manufacturers Life Insurance v. Beardsley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1961No. Docket 30, Calendar 48,789PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

This appeal presents no reversible error. It is an appeal from a chancellor’s decree canceling a life insurance contract and enjoining defendant as the beneficiary named therein from prosecuting an action at law to recover on the contract. The contract of insurance was issued in November of 1956 on the life of Burl Beardsley, defendant’s husband, who died 1 year after the policy was issued.

The chancellor found that certain of the answers contained in the application for insurance were false. Although he found no actual intent on the part of the insured to deceive the insurance company, he did…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. AsheMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Bellestri-Fontana v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. General American Life Ins. v. WojciechowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. National Life & Accident Insurance v. NagelMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Life Insurance Company of Virginia v. ShiffletSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. CusickMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Howard v. Golden State Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. AbbottMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API