Legal Opinion

State v. . Young

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was an indictment for homicide, tried at the Fall Term, 1892, of Union Superior Court, before Graves, J. There was a verdict of guilty, and defendant appealed upon the grounds set out in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Burwell, J.:

The prisoner’s counsel, in apt time, requested his Honor to put his “entire charge” in writing, and pursuant to this request the charge in chief was written out and read to the jury and they withdrew. The “case on appeal,,r which we must accept as an exact account of the proceedings on trial, states that after the jury had been out for sometime, they “returned into Court and asked for further instruction as to the difference between manslaughter and murder, and his Honor proceeded to comply with their request, but failed to reduce his charge to the jury to writing, as he had ■been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Currie v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Wheatley & Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  3. State Ex Rel. Drake v. ConnellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RiniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. State v. CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. State v. . CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. State v. Dewey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API