Legal Opinion

Teaneck Board of Education v. Teaneck Teachers Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 18, 1983PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

O’HERN, J.

This appeal requires us to determine whether a teacher’s claim of reverse discrimination in hiring may be submitted to binding arbitration under the terms of a collective negotiations agreement. We hold that the public employer’s decision on hiring implicates an exercise of a governmental function that is not subject to binding arbitration, although it is subject to review by the Division on Civil Rights. We affirm the judgment below.

I

The Teaneck Teachers Association filed a grievance on behalf of John A. Zubiaurre, a teacher, alleging racial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Kearny PBA Local 21 v. Town of KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Ridgefield Park Education Ass'n v. Ridgefield Park Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. City of Hackensack v. WinnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. State v. State Supervisory Employees AssociationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dixon v. Rutgers, the State University of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Thornton v. Potamkin ChevroletSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. State, Office of Employee Rel. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. Kristiansen v. MorganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  5. Scotch Plains-Fanwood Board of Education v. Scotch Plains-Fanwood Education Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API