Gambling v. Cornish
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRADY, District Judge.
The defendant City of Chicago has moved for summary judgment on Count III of plaintiff’s complaint. Count III is a diversity claim in which plaintiff seeks damages from the City of Chicago under the theory of respondeat superior for intentional torts allegedly committed by two Chicago police officers, also named as defendants. We will grant summary judgment for the City. In granting summary judgment, we rely only on the facts which plaintiff submitted with her motion and testified to in her deposition.
FACTS
The following summarizes plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Saragusa v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Dunbar v. ReiserIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Bremen State Bank v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and Bekins Van & Storage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Vargas v. CorreaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- John R. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Sawyer v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Boykin v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bates v. DoriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.