Legal Opinion

Gambling v. Cornish

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 17, 1977No. 74 C 3495PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRADY, District Judge.

The defendant City of Chicago has moved for summary judgment on Count III of plaintiff’s complaint. Count III is a diversity claim in which plaintiff seeks damages from the City of Chicago under the theory of respondeat superior for intentional torts allegedly committed by two Chicago police officers, also named as defendants. We will grant summary judgment for the City. In granting summary judgment, we rely only on the facts which plaintiff submitted with her motion and testified to in her deposition.

FACTS

The following summarizes plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Saragusa v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Dunbar v. ReiserIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bremen State Bank v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and Bekins Van & Storage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  4. Vargas v. CorreaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. John R. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Sawyer v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Boykin v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Bates v. DoriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API