Legal Opinion

Gucker v. Town of Huntington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.

These four actions involve the same questions of law and fact; they were tried, and are now decided, together.

*495The actions were to set aside, as clouds upon plaintiffs’ titles, three quitclaim deeds, the first made by the Northport Clay and Fire Sand Company to Samuel Carter, the second by Samuel Carter to the defendant DeBrabant, and the third by the defendant DeBrabant to the town of Huntington. These deeds purport to release to each of the grantees the title to a certain sand bar running from the mainland in a southwesterly direction out under the waters of what has been variously described…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mulry v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Tiffany v. . Town of Oyster BayNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Tiffany v. . Town of Oyster BayNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. O'Donnell v. . KelseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  5. Tiffany v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gucker v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Gucker v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Gucker v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API