Legal Opinion

People v. Neuschatz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 29, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Judgment of conviction affirmed.

An investigator employed in a District Attorney’s office is a police officer (CPL 1.20, subd 34, par [g]), and this status conferred on him authority to issue a simplified traffic information accusing a person of committing a traffic infraction (CPL 100.10, subd 2, par [a]). Since a police officer may make an arrest on a 24-hour basis for any offense which he has reasonable cause to believe a person has committed in his presence (CPL 140.10, subd 1; Matter of Washington v New York City Housing Auth., 31 AD2d 700, affd 24 NY2d 912), it was irrelevant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Washington v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. LucianiNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Dill v. Village of GowandaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
  3. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1991
  4. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1991
  5. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API