Legal Opinion

Metsker v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1942No. 28494PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover upon an insurance contract which provided monthly payments in the event of disability of the insured. The case, tried to a jury, resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial were presented by defendant and denied by the trial court. Thereafter judgment was entered upon the verdict and defendant appealed.

The assignments of error are in the admission of evidence and in the refusal to grant the motion for a new trial.

The facts are these: During the year 1926, appellant issued to respondent…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Warren v. HynesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Horn's Administrator v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Hill v. Great Northern Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stone v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Lynch v. Republic Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. GM Northrup Corporation v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  4. Page v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Page v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API