In Re Third Ave. Transit Corp. Melniker v. Lehman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
The bankruptcy court had the power, in appropriate circumstances, under Section 116, sub. 2 of the Bankruptcy Act, to authorize the borrowing of money, from voluntary lenders, on trustees’ certificates, having a lien on mortgage assets superior to previously existing mortgage liens. 3 To substitute for the use of that power — which itself must be most cautious ly employed 4 — the court’s far more drastic power under Section 257, 5 requires proof of the most extraordinary circumstances— see R. F. C. v. Kaplan, 1 Cir., 185 F.2d 791, 795 6 not present here. 7 We think that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Eastern Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bullock v. Florida Ex Rel. Railroad Comm'n of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. Prima Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Kaplan in Re Waltham Watch CoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re Penn Central Transportation CompanySpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1974
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- In Re Timbers Of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Empire Enterprises, Inc. v. Koopmans (In Re Koopmans)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.