Legal Opinion

ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 16, 2009No. M2008-02008-COA-R3-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · FarmerDavid R. Farmer, J.

in which ALAN E. HIGHERS, P.J., W.S., and HOLLY M. KIRBY, J., joined.

The trial court ruled that taxpayer ADT Security Services was liable for sales and use tax on equipment it installed as part of its security monitoring service contracts. The trial court also ruled that taxpayer was entitled to offset its liability for sales and use taxes, under the doctrine of equitable recoupment, by taxes taxpayer had charged and remitted on the installation of the equipment. We affirm the trial court’s judgment with respect to taxpayer’s liability for sales and use taxes, and reverse with respect…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Eastman Chemical Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Hill v. City of GermantownTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lipscomb v. DoeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dorothy King v. Virginia BettsTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Branch Banking And Trust Company v. Wayne R. HillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019
  3. Creative Label, Inc. v. David Tuck, Weakley County Assessor of PropertyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  4. Dorothy King v. Virginia BettsTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Dr. Victor W. McLaughlin, M.D. v. Elizabeth King McLaughlin a/k/a Rev. Elizabeth KingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API