Legal Opinion

Kelley v. City of Cape Girardeau

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1933Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

BAILEY, J.

Plaintiff has filed a motion for rehearing based on one point only, i. e., that defendant was estopped from raising the defense of, “splitting of causes of action,” as a bar to this action, because that defense was not interposed in a former action between the same parties. We briefly disposed of that contention in the foregoing opinion because we considered that proposition to be without merit. We are still of that opinion. The record in this case discloses that on the 5th day of May, 1924, plaintiff filed in the Cape Girardeau Court of Common Pleas a suit…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loud v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Blair v. Center Creek Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  3. Lynch v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Thompson v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. State ex rel. St. Joseph Water Co. v. EastinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API