Legal Opinion

United States Time Corp. v. Ann & Hope Factory Outlet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 3, 1964No. C. Q. No. 1-60Published

1Opinion of the Court

205 A.2d 125 (1964)

The UNITED STATES TIME CORPORATION

v.

ANN & HOPE FACTORY OUTLET, INC.

C. Q. No. 1-60.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

December 3, 1964.

Factor, Chernick & Hillman, William C. Hillman, Pawtucket, for complainant.

Needham, Silverstein & Shatkin, Thomas N. Needham, Providence, Seifert Rothwell & Mandell, Thomas A. Rothwell, New York City, amici curiae.

Abedon & Abedon, Herbert J. Abedon, Bernard B. Abedon, Providence, for respondent.

Levy, Carroll, Jacobs & Kelley, Daniel Jacobs, Providence, amici curiae.

JOSLIN, Justice.

This is a bill in equity to enjoin the respondent from violating…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Bourjois Sales Corp. v. DorfmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. White Cross Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Bulova Watch Co. v. Zale Jewelry Co. of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1962

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API