Legal Opinion

Mazer v. City Nat. Bank of Tuscaloosa

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1933No. 6 Div. 386PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The Leland-MeGee Hardware Company was in financial difficulties, and by instrument in writing, including general power of attorney, conveyed and turned over the assets of the company, for the benefit of its .creditors, to A. C. Cade, Gordon D. Palmer, and J. F. Watson. Included in this assignment ■ were the book accounts of the hardware company. The assets of the Leland-McGee Hardware Company were by the assignees acting under the written assignment, and the officers of the hardware company, sold and conveyed to these plaintiffs. This sale included the book accounts, and among…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Morton v. PrestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Arlington State Bank v. PaulsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Jackson v. McCallaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gibson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Brown v. OlssonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API