In re the Claim of Killian
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Mercure, J. (dissenting).
We respectfully dissent. We will at the outset note our agreement with the majority’s implicit conclusion that the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s determination to award benefits in this case may have the effect of depriving future college students of the opportunity to participate in worthwhile industry cooperative programs. As such, we agree that the Board’s decision reflects poor policy. However, unlike the majority, we accept the limited scope of our judicial review function and the general authority of an administrative agency to fix short-sighted policy…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Claim of FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re the Claim of HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re the Claim of FranconeriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of Le PorteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re the Claim of KalichmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.