Legal Opinion
Davis v. American Highwall Mining, LLC
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided September 11, 2020No. 6:19-cv-00096Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION LONDON BART DAVIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) No. 6:19-CV-00096-MAS AMERICAN HIGHWALL MINING, ) LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff Bart Davis (“Davis”) moves to compel Defendant American Highwall Mining, LLC (“AHM”) to respond more fully to certain interrogatories and document production requests. [DE 21]. AHM responded to the motion [DE 23]; Davis did not elect to reply. The parties agree that some extension of the expert disclosure deadlines is warranted, though the precise extent hinges on resolution of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cunningham v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Sharon Surles, by Next Friend Jayneice Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Superior Production Partnership v. Gordon Auto Body Parts Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Myhre v. Seventh-Day Adventist Church Reform Movement American Union International Missionary SocietyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014