Legal Opinion

Dance v. Bingham Memorial Hospital

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1992No. 19493Published

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Chief Justice.

The Industrial Commission (Commission) found Amanda Dance (claimant) permanently and totally disabled under the odd-lot doctrine and apportioned liability for the claimant's benefits between the Industrial Special Indemnity Fund (ISIF) and Bingham Memorial Hospital (Hospital) and its surety the State Insurance Fund. ISIF appeals from the Commission’s apportionment contending that the Commission erred in considering the claimant’s pre-existing pain because the pain was derived from a psychological condition which is not a pre-existing permanent physical impairment under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hartley v. Miller-StephanIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Urry v. Walker & Fox Masonry ContractorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bartel v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Red Lion Motor Inn-Riverside v. Industrial Sp. Indem. FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API