Legal Opinion

Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 19, 1994No. Consolidated Court No. 88-07-00488Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Restani, Judge:

This matter is before the court on three motions pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2 for judgment upon the agency record. The motions have been brought by (1) the Independent Radionic Workers of America, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Technical, Salaried and Machine Workers (AFL-CIO) and the Industrial Union Department (AFL-CIO) (collectively “the Unions”), (2) Zenith Electronics Corporation, and (3) Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively “Samsung”). The court has…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Olympic Adhesives, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd. And Daewoo Electronics Corp. Of America, Inc., and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. And Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Goldstar Co., Ltd. And Goldstar Electronics International, Inc. v. International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Technical, Salaried and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers of America, Independent Radionic Workers of America and Industrial Union Department, Afl-Cio v. Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  5. Budd Co., Wheel & Brake Division v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API