Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marston v. Rivers

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 30, 1927No. 12131Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Cothran :

I dissent from the conclusions reached in this appeal by Mr. Justice Blease upon the grounds which follow.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendant, Rivers, to the Carolina Bond & Mortgage Company (hereinafter referred to as “the company”), securing a -note for $1,200.00, dated July 7, 1919, due July 1, 1922, with interest from date at 8 per cent, per annum, alleged to have been assigned for value to the plaintiff, Marston, on November 12, 1919, before its maturity.

The complaint is in the usual form, alleging the execution and delivery of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bacot v. South Carolina Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. Westbury v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  3. Batesburg Cotton Oil Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  4. Carver v. San Joaquin Cigar Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Maxwell v. FosterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API