Legal Opinion
Petkas v. WRIGHT COMPANY INC.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 13, 1952No. 34290PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Error is assigned in the first special ground of the amended motion for a new trial on the action of the court in restricting cross-examination of a witness for the plaintiff who was credit manager for the plaintiff corporation. The question, “Isn’t it true that your company has had a practice of picking up articles when restaurant people find they don’t need them?” was disallowed, and the ruling was to the effect that evidence of a custom of the plaintiff corporation of picking up articles not used by the purchaser would be limited to dealings between the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New Zealand Fire Insurance v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Robertson v. Wilder & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- American National Insurance v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Cook v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Dublin & Southwestern Railway Co. v. Akerman & AkermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hill v. General Rediscount CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Harvey v. DeWeillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Callaway v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Grant v. RiversCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Evans v. BredowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.