Legal Opinion

Ernst Seidelman Corp. v. Mollison

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 26, 1950No. Civ. No. 928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEVIN, Chief Judge.

On March 9, 1950, plaintiff herein filed a document entitled Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. With its “Cross-Motion” and attached thereto, and in support thereof, plaintiff filed two affidavits and certain exhibits. One affidavit was that of Rich-art H. Weis and the other of Bernard J. Gardener.

On June 1, 1950, defendants filed a motion wherein they move that the Court “order stricken for non-compliance with Rule 56 (e) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure” (1) the entire affidavit of Richard H. Weis and (2) “certain portions of the affidavit of Bernard J. Gardener, and all…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Reddy v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  2. Newton v. MisnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wilson v. BudcoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  4. Rhea v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2005
  5. Kaylor v. Holsinger (In Re Holsinger)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API