Legal Opinion
Shomar Construction Services, Inc. v. Lawman Construction Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 18, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of plaintiffs motion seeking summary judgment on the third cause of action. Plaintiff established that defendant Lawman Construction Company, Inc. (Lawman) breached its liquidation agreement with plaintiff by failing to present plaintiffs claim to defendant City of Syracuse (City), and plaintiff is entitled to damages arising from that breach. The court also properly granted that part of plaintiffs motion seeking summary judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moser v. SpizzirroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- East 15360 Corp. v. Provident Loan SocietyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Town & Country Linoleum & Carpet Co. v. WelchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Old Oak Realty, Inc. v. PolimeniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Goldome Corporation v. WittigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- First Keystone Consultants, Inc. v. DDR Construction ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Manti's Transportation, Inc. v. C.T. Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- RAD & D'Aprile Inc. v. Arnell Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2015