Menke v. Ohio High School Athletic Assn.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The central focus in this appeal is the enforceability of Rule 9, Section 2(g) (hereinafter “Rule 9-2[g]”) of the Ohio High School Athletic Association (hereinafter “Association”), which reads in full as follows:
“A student whose parents live in another state will be ineligible for athletics in an Ohio member school.”
Contrary to plaintiffs’ claims that Rule 9-2(g) violates provisions of the United States Constitution, that it was adopted arbitrarily and through impermissible collusion, and that the court should therefore enjoin its enforcement, the trial court denied plaintiffs’ request for a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Spring Branch I.S.D. v. StamosTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Carlberg Ex Rel. CarlbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Bailey v. TrubyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Hebert v. VentetuoloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.