Legal Opinion

City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire v. Richard Schlesinger and William Weinstein

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 9, 1996No. 94-1274Published

1Per curiam

The Supreme Court of New Hampshire issued its opinion on March 12, 1996, in City of Portsmouth v. Schlesinger, et al., 672 A.2d 712 (N.H.1996), responding to the question certified by this court on June 13, 1995. See City of Portsmouth v. Schlesinger, 57 F.3d 12, 18 (1st Cir.1995).

Having dealt with appellant’s other arguments in our earlier decision, the sole remaining issue in this appeal is whether the appellees’ so-called “illegality” defense was time barred. The district court held the defense timely and, ruling that it applied to appellant’s conduct, entered judgment for the appellees.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Portsmouth New Hampshire v. Richard Schlesinger and William WeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. City of Portsmouth v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API