Legal Opinion

R.L.M. v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 30, 2004No. CR-03-0209Published

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLAN, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, R.L.M., appeals from the trial court’s order adjudicating him delinquent for the offense of receiving stolen property in the third degree, a violation of § 13A-8-19, Ala.Code 1975.

The appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal because, he says, the State failed to prove a prima facie case of receiving stolen property in the third degree. Specifically, he argues that the State failed to prove that the property he was accused of receiving had any monetary value.

The record indicates that the appellant was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. Booker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Benefield v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. DeBruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API