Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Fritz

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1910No. 6396PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Mesa District Court — Hon. Sprigg Shackelford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

June 30, 1906, the appellant executed in writing and delivered to the appellee his promissory note for $500.00 with interest, due nine months after date. It not being paid at maturity, 'this action was instituted to recover judgment thereon. The appellant, in his answer, admitted the execution of the note, but denied that it had not.been paid. He alleged the appellee was indebted to him for money loaned, work and labor performed, and feed and provisions furnished, in the sum of $409.25. Trial was by jury. Judgment was for the plaintiff.

It was shown at the trial that these parties had entered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hurlburt v. DusenberySupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  2. Calliope Mining Co. v. HerzingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Exchange Nat. Bank of Colo. Springs v. SparkmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Arkansas Valley Bank v. EsserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API