Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Holloway v. Washburn

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 5, 2001No. 5D00-3349Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

SHARP, W., J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur with the majority opinion in full. I would simply add thereto that on remand the trial court should reconsider the propriety of awarding the former wife some or all of her attorney’s fees. There is a wide disparity of income and income-earning ability between the parties. See White v. White, 575 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The former wife should not have to use her assets obtained through equitable distribution or alimony to pay her attorney’s fees under these circumstances. See Flemming v. Flemming, 742 So.2d 843 (Fla. 1st…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API