Legal Opinion

Newton, Admx. v. Hunt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1952No. 18,192Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Royse, J.

I cannot agree with the majority opinion in this case. I agree with the following statement in the majority opinion:

“Therefore, as contended by appellee, the appellant, whose authority is strictly limited by statute, had no authority to recover for the estate that property which had already been fully administered. As contended further by appellee, any action to declare a trust and to recover property already administered but alleged to have been thereafter converted, must be brought in the name of the beneficiaries who are the real parties in interest.”

In my…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fink v. PedenIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Michigan Trust Co. v. ProbascoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Murphey v. MurpheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Newton, Admx. v. HuntIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Case v. DealIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API