Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Kendall

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

While the law implies a promise to compensate valuable services rendered, there is a well established exception to this general rule, which has found frequent expression by this court in the following language:

“Where near relatives by blood or marriage reside together as one common family, and one of them renders-services to another, and such other furnishes him board and lodging or other necessaries or comforts, a presumption arises that neither party intended to receive or to pay compensation for the services rendered on the one hand, or for the board and lodging or other necessaries or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of KesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Williams v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. In re Schmidt's EstateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Matter of Estate of SteffesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Estate of Goltz v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hammond v. GhentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Shimek v. Estate of ShimekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Estate of Marotz v. SchwahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API