Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 26, 2006No. Docket Nos. 05-4260-CV(L), 05-42639-CV (CON)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KATZMANN, Circuit Judge.
This case arises out of the City of New York’s (the “City”) attempts to collect property taxes from certain foreign missions to the United Nations that have been using parts of them embassy buildings for purposes that, the City argues, render at least those portions of those buildings subject to property taxation. The merits of that claim are not before us in this interlocutory appeal. Instead, we are called upon to answer a preliminary question of first impression in this circuit — whether, pursuant to the “immovable property” exception to the Foreign Sovereign…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Saudi Arabia v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Vera v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. PERMANENT MISSION OF NAMIBIACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Vera v. Republic of CubaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Gutch v. Federal Republic of GermanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Seneca CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.