City of Orlando v. Lemay
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Judge.
The employer and its servicing agent appeal a workers’ compensation order by which benefits were awarded in connection with a hearing loss injury. The judge found that this injury resulted from the cumulative effect of the claimant’s continued exposure to loud noises at work, and that these multiple exposures constituted repeated accidents. Although the claim was based on a date of accident coinciding with earlier exposure, the employer and servicing agent contend that the last injurious exposure should have been used as the date of accident. We conclude that the judge did not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Festa v. Teleflex, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Worden v. Pratt and Whitney AircraftSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Tokyo House, Inc. v. Hsin ChuDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL BD. v. HigginsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Aetna Life & Cas. Co. v. SchmittDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. American Re-Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Malt Bros. I, Ltd. v. State Farm Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Leon Smith v. City of Daytona Beach Police Dept./City of etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. American Re-Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997