Legal Opinion
Bigelow v. Drummond
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Demubbeb by the plaintiff to the second defense to the third cause of action alleged in the complaint in this action.
1Opinion of the CourtRogees, J.
The complaint contains three counts, the first of which is as follows: “ Plaintiffs, as the State Board of Pharmacy, complain of defendant and allege that they constitute the State Board of Pharmacy of the State of Hew York, duly elected, qualified and acting as such; and that prior to the commencement hereof, said board has duly authorized this action to be brought in its name.
On information and belief:
Birst cause of action:
“ I. That at all the times hereinafter mentioned the defendant was duly licensed as a pharmacist and druggist to retail drugs, medicines and poisons and compound…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aurora City v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Baxter v. . McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- People v. . BoothNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- United States v. Gurney and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
- Caulkins v. . BoltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Groton Bridge & Mfg. Co. v. American Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1907