Rosenthal v. Pierson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Fred. Durieve King, Judge. In the matter of the succession of J. J. Gragard. Action by Paul Rosenthal against Ed. Pierson, administrator, to call the balance due. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement.
MONROE, J.
In February, 1904, Paul Rosenthal filed a petition in the above-entitled succession, alleging that between January 1 and July 31, 1899, the decedent, as his *98agent and factor, sold various lots of cotton, made collections, and honored drafts, for his account, and that there is a balance due him, resulting from said transactions, amounting to $2,450.99, as appears from decedent’s ledger, an excerpt from which he annexes to, and makes part of, his petition, and he prays that the administrator be cited, and that he be recognized as a creditor of the succession for that amount.…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Maddox v. RobbertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Coignet v. NelsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911