Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Dunham

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Various defendants appeal from a judgment in this suit, which was brought to procure a judicial settlement of the accounts of a deceased testamentary trustee, and for other relief.

1Opinion of the CourtBartlett, J.

The various controversies to which this suit relates arise under the last will and testament of Miss Frances B. liegeman, deceased,: who died in 1878. The executors and trustees named in the will were Nicholas F. Palmer and Richard H. Bowne. Mr. Bowne died in 1881, and thereafter Mr. Palmer acted as sole executor gnd trustee until his own death, in 1887. The plaintiff in the present action is the son of Nicholas F. Palmer, who had been employed as an accountant in reference to the affairs of the estate, and who, when his father died, took charge of the money, securities, and other property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Accounting of BensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Wagstaff v. LowerreNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  3. In re KelloggNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  4. In re RobertsNew York Court of Chancery · 1817

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BusheNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Whitehead v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of ZieglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of ToddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. In re the Estate of CouttsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API