Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service v. Quaid (In Re Luster)

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 2, 1992No. Bankruptcy 92 C 225, 78 B 9574PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KOCORAS, District Judge:

This is an appeal by the Internal Revenue Service from a decision of the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois to grant the trustee’s motion for summary judgment. The trustee has filed a cross-appeal. For the reasons set forth below, we will only entertain the Internal Revenue Service’s appeal. In doing so, we reverse the bankruptcy court’s decision.

BACKGROUND

On December 6, 1978, Melvin Luster (“Luster”) and Harold Friedman (“Friedman”) filed individual petitions for relief under the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 (the “Bankruptcy Act”).…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Libson Shops, Inc., v. Koehler, District Director of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Melvin R. Luster, Debtor. In the Matter of Harold E. Friedman, Debtor. Appeal of Dennis E. Quaid, Trustee. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. United States ex rel. Internal Revenue Service v. Quaid (In re Friedman)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API