Legal Opinion

Washington St. Tammany Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 29, 2007No. 2007-CA-0399PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVictory, J.

|! Washington St. Tammany Electric Cooperative, Inc. (“WST”) and Cleco Power, LLC. (“Cleco”) are competing to serve customers in the La Chenier Subdivision in Slidell, Louisiana. The issue in this case is whether WST violated the “300 Foot Rule” by extending electrical service to points of connection in the subdivision that were within 300 feet of Cleco’s existing power lines.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

WST contracted with the developer of the La Chenier Subdivision to provide electrical service to the subdivision, pursuant to which it agreed to construct electric facilities in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wst Elec. Coop., Inc. v. La. Public Service Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  2. La. Power & Light Co. v. La. Public Serv. Com'n.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  3. Plantation v. La. Public Service Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  4. La. Power & Light Co. v. LA. PUBLIC SERVICE COMM'NSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. Claiborne Elec. Coop., Inc. v. LA. PUBLIC SERVICE COM'NSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AshleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Entergy Louisiana, LLC v. Louisiana Public Service Commission, Concordia Electric Cooperative Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API