Lemon v. State

Quillian, Chief Judge.

Arthur J. Lemon appeals from his conviction of two counts of “peeping tom.”

Case No. 62437

1. The trial court did not err in admitting evidence of prior acts of the defendant which amounted to the offense of “peeping tom.” “ ‘[B]efore evidence of independent crimes is admissible two conditions must be satisfied. First,,'there must be evidence that the defendant was in fact the perpetrator . . . Second, there must be sufficient similarity or connection between the independent crime and the offense charged that proof of the former tends to prove the latter. French v. State,…