Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Heublein, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided October 27, 1997No. Civil Action 3:97-CV314BNPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand; (2) Plaintiffs’ Rebuttal Motion to Remand; and (3) Motion to Strike Rebuttal Motion to Remand filed by the Defendants Heublein, Inc. (“Heublein”) and Canandaigua Wine Company, Inc. (“Canandaigua”). Having considered the Motions, the Defendants’ Response to the Motion to Remand, 1 all attachments to each, supporting and opposing memoranda, and the entire court file in this matter, the Court finds that the Motion to Remand and the Rebuttal Motion to Remand are not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- David C. Wilson v. Intercollegiate (Big Ten) Conference Athletic Association, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Fletcher v. HamletSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Cliett v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Jenkins v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1997
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johnson v. Heublein Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Aguayo v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- De La Rosa v. Reliable, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- McDaniel v. LoyaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Hernandez v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.