Legal Opinion

Branecky v. Seaman

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 13, 1984No. 13-84-238-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by Michael Branecky, an architect, urging that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Roger Seaman, a landowner, that the appellant was not entitled to a statutory or constitutional lien.

The facts, as set out in the summary judgment proof, are as follows: Appellant contends that he entered into a contract with National Motel, Inc., and Sterling Bennett in January 1983 for architectural services to be performed by the appellant with regard to a proposed motel project. Appellant architect alleges that he prepared the plans and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sanguinett & Staats v. Colorado Salt Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Lancaster v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrell v. Harrell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  2. Stillwater Natlional Bank & Trust Co. v. CookCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. In re Anderson Resources Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1986
  4. STILLWATER NAT. BANK & TRUST CO. v. CookCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API