Legal Opinion

Bristol Iron & Steel Co. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided July 16, 1896PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from a decree of tlie Hustings Court of the city of Radford, pronounced December 19, 1894, in sundry chancery suits heard together in all of which the appellant was a defendant, and in one of which the appellee, Thomas, was the complainant.

1Opinion of the Court

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

James P. Withrow entered into a contract with the Bristol Iron and Steel Company for the construction of a complete blast furnace plant in accordance with certain plans and specifications. When the work had been partially completed, Withrow becoming embarrassed, made a general assignment for the benefit of his creditors, including therein the contract with the Steel and Iron Company, and whatever might be due him from the said company for work performed and supplies and material already furnished. After the assignment, Thomas, the assignee, went on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Iaege v. BossieuxSupreme Court of Virginia · 1859

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. William R. Trigg Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  2. Clement v. Adams Bros.-Paynes Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  3. Southern Surety Co. of New York v. First State Bank of MarquezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Lewers & Cooke, Ltd. v. Wong WongHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Shickel v. Berryville Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1901

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API