Legal Opinion
Chemical Weapons Working Group v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 19, 1999No. Misc. A. 98-156(AER)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AUBREY E. ROBINSON, Jr., District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of documents. Upon consideration of the entire record, and for the reasons stated below, the Court will deny the motion.1
Background
Plaintiffs have subpoenaed documents which represent drafts of EPA’s revisions to its 1994 Review Draft of the Dioxin Reassessment.2 The Dioxin Reassessment represents EPA’s best effort to analyze and syn*2thesize the available scientific data to provide to EPA policy makers and program officials an assessment of the risk to human health…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- William Jordan v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Dudman Communications Corporation v. Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Sidney M. Wolfe v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. EdelinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Eugene Burger Management Corp. v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Raiser v. San Diego CountyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.