Legal Opinion

In re Erie Lumber Co.

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided September 26, 1906PublishedCited by 21 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On exceptions to report of special master fixing priorities of claims.

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, District Judge.

The Erie Dumber Company had its manufacturing plant near Dumber, City, in this district. It was a venture of an important character in the manufacture of lumber. In addition'to the sawmill, there was extensive machinery for the manufacure of veneering, which is largely used in furniture and cabinet work. The plant was under the control of one Alfred Short, who represented certain interests, and Sylvester J. Tinthoff, who represented others. There was an utter disagreement between these men, and finally Tinthoff, who represented the creditors, filed a proceeding praying…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Miltenberger v. Logansport Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Wallace v. LoomisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Ridgely Nat. Bank v. MathenyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Clay v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  2. In Re Avorn Dress Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. In re HowardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1913
  4. Smith v. Shenandoah Valley Nat. Bank of Winchester, VACourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
  5. Amick v. HotzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API