Legal Opinion

Ridgely v. Spenser

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1809PublishedCited by 3 opinions

IN ERROR. WRIT of error to the Common Pleas of Huntingdon county. The. plaintiffs in error brought an action on the case against the defendant as a common carrier by water, for not delivering at Baltimore, certain forge hammers and castings which he had received at Hoshel’s landing upon the Juniata, and undertook to carry for hire.

Read the full summary

IN ERROR. WRIT of error to the Common Pleas of Huntingdon county. The. plaintiffs in error brought an action on the case against the defendant as a common carrier by water, for not delivering at Baltimore, certain forge hammers and castings which he had received at Hoshel’s landing upon the Juniata, and undertook to carry for hire. Upon the trial of the cause, the defendant’s counsel offered in evidence the record of a verdict which had been given upon a former trial of this cause, and was afterwards set aside. The evidence was objected to; but the court admitted it, and sealed a bill of…

1Per curiam

The former verdict in this cause was not legal evidence. Let the judgment be reversed, and a venire ie novo be awarded.

Judgment reversed, and venire, de novo.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shaeffer v. KreitzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1814
  2. Snyder v. CastorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1807
  3. Fisher v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API