Legal Opinion

In re Ruthanne F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Family Court’s determination that the physical, mental or emotional condition of respondent Tina F.’s two-year-old son was in imminent danger of becoming impaired as a result of respondents’ failure to exercise a minimum degree of care (see, Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]) and that respondents’ other children were derivatively neglected by respondents (see, Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs, v Douglas E., 191 AD2d 694) is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]). The record establishes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Nicole V.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Nassau County Department of Social Services Ex. Rel. Dante M. v. Denise J.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Dutchess County Department of Social Services ex rel. Douglas E. v. Douglas E.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. In re Michelle S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. In re Lonell J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Jonathan S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re Scott M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. B., RAVEN, MTR. OFAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. B., TIMOTHY, MTR. OFAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. In re Matthew K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API