Legal Opinion
R-S-J
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1999No. ID 3401PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3401 In re R-S-J-, Respondent Decided June 10, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals For purposes of section 101(f)(6) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(6) (1994), false oral statements under oath to an asylum officer can constitute false tes- timony as defined by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Phinpathya v. INS,
673 F.2d 1013
(9th Cir. 1981), rev’d on other grounds,
464 U.S. 183
(1984). Madan Ahluwalia, Esquire, San Francisco, California, for respondent Richard…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jarnail Singh v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Luciana v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Teresa M. Medina v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Reynoso v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Maqsood HaroonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.